摘要：接下來為大家帶來社會犯罪類話題雅思大作文（同意與否題型）的一篇范文：關于人們是否應該遵守社會法律。我們一起來看解析和范文！

Task:Society is based on rules and laws. It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

思路解析：

應該遵守：法律和法規是社會有序運行的前提，它們規范了人們的行為和思想，讓人們的活動能限制在一個安全的，合法的范圍。相反，一旦人們恣意妄為地來忽略這些法律的話，整個社會會陷入混亂。舉例，如果交通法規不被遵守，則會出現大量的車禍。如果刑法不被遵守的話，則會出現大量的社會犯罪。

不應該遵守：對于那些不公正的法律，人們應該被授予足夠的自由來進行對抗。舉例，如果美國今天仍然保留著奴隸法案的話，則今天的美國黑人將處境悲慘，沒有教育，醫療，工作和投票的權利?？梢钥吹?，這樣的法律必將引發來自黑人的憤怒，反抗，甚至是戰爭。

參考范文：

Nowadays, there is an assertion that the freedom of citizens should be limited; otherwise it might harm the social laws and justice system, thus making our society unstable. Personally, this view is psychologically right, while it overlooks the importance of fighting against the unfair laws freely.

Firstly, there is no doubt that obeying social rules and laws is the fundamental obligation for all individuals, for the reason that they serve as a key function of ensuring our society running on the right track. Obviously, these regulations define the borders between the right and the wrong, the social ethics and day-to-day conduct standards, all of which can instruct and regulate citizens to act and think in a lawful, polite and safe way. Otherwise, the ignorance of these regulations, or so-called “an absolute freedom”, will trap our society into chaos and even malfunction. For example, if the traffic laws were disrespected, it is expected that all streets and highways will be full of congestions and car crashes caused by wrongdoings in driving like blind over speed or overtaking. Similarly, if the criminal law were absent, then there will be no concern of punishments for committing crimes. Consequently, illegal activities including thefts, robberies, arson, rapes, vandalism and murders will be overwhelming, which will not only place the poverties and lives of the public in the danger, but also destroy today’s civilization in a long term.

However, there is always a justification that people should be allowed to freely question and topple those unfair laws that are the barriers of democracy development. In history, the typical example is the slavery law in America that defined African-Americans as second-class citizens and deprived their rights of public education, health care and vote. If this evil law were just followed, instead of being eradicated through the pursuit of human freedom, we now can predict clearly that current the community of America would be still full of inequity, discrimination, and massive social disorder caused by conflicts between the black and white.

All in all, I agree that it is very necessary to limit the freedom of the public by confining their behaviors in the bounds of social regulation and laws, which is the pre-condition of social democracy and stability. However, when it comes to unjust laws, the public should have the freedom to eliminate them.

(392 words)